Abstract

Our profession's recent focus on the social construction of knowledge and the roles that discourse and community play in this construction have made some of us aware of disturbing characteristics in our classrooms. We now notice, for instance, that the traditional forums comprising these classrooms-group discussions, lectures, teacher-student conferences, written assignments-generally support a traditional hegemony in which teachers determine appropriate and inappropriate discourse. We notice, further, that this political arrangement encourages intellectual accommodation in students, discourages intellectual resistance, and hence may seriously limit students' understanding of, and effective use of, language. As a result, we have begun to recognize the need for non-traditional forums for academic exchange, forums that allow interaction patterns disruptive of a teacher-centered hegemony. These forums should encourage students to use language to resist as well as to accommodate and should enable individuals to create internally persuasive discourse as well as to adopt discourse validated by external authority. In creating such non-traditional forums to supplement the work now going on in our classrooms, we tacitly argue for the importance of discourse in learning, the importance of students talking and writing to one another as well as to the teacher as they attempt to come to terms with the theories and concepts raised in their courses. This particular kind of learning does not take place often enough within the forums characteristic of our traditional classrooms, where interaction-at least the approved kind of interaction-is all too often dyadic, emphasizing the role of the all-knowing teacher discussing a topic with quiet, attentive students who may respond to the teacher but not directly to one another. Socrates tells Phaedrus that this is the ideal learning situation: lucidity and completeness and serious importance belong only to those lessons on justice and honor and goodness

Journal
College English
Published
1990-12-01
DOI
10.2307/377388
CompPile
Search in CompPile ↗
Open Access
Closed
Topics
Export

Citation Context

Cited by in this index (52)

  1. Assessing Writing
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Computers and Composition
  4. Computers and Composition
  5. Rhetoric Review
Show all 52 →
  1. Computers and Composition
  2. Computers and Composition
  3. Pedagogy
  4. Pedagogy
  5. Computers and Composition
  6. Computers and Composition
  7. Computers and Composition
  8. Computers and Composition
  9. Computers and Composition
  10. Computers and Composition
  11. Computers and Composition
  12. Computers and Composition
  13. Written Communication
  14. Computers and Composition
  15. Written Communication
  16. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  17. Computers and Composition
  18. Computers and Composition
  19. Computers and Composition
  20. Computers and Composition
  21. Computers and Composition
  22. Computers and Composition
  23. Computers and Composition
  24. Computers and Composition
  25. Computers and Composition
  26. Computers and Composition
  27. Computers and Composition
  28. Computers and Composition
  29. Computers and Composition
  30. Computers and Composition
  31. Computers and Composition
  32. Computers and Composition
  33. Written Communication
  34. Computers and Composition
  35. Computers and Composition
  36. Computers and Composition
  37. Computers and Composition
  38. Technical Communication Quarterly
  39. Computers and Composition
  40. Computers and Composition
  41. Technical Communication Quarterly
  42. Computers and Composition
  43. Computers and Composition
  44. Journal of Business and Technical Communication
  45. Rhetoric Review
  46. Written Communication
  47. Written Communication

References (0)

No references on file for this article.