Assessing Writing

198 articles
Year: Topic: Clear
Export:
multilingual writers ×

January 2017

  1. Are TOEFL iBT® writing test scores related to keyboard type? A survey of keyboard-related practices at testing centers
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.04.001
  2. “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001

October 2016

  1. Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.001
  2. Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003

July 2016

  1. Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002
  2. Farewell to holistic scoring. Part Two: Why build a house with only one brick?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.006

April 2016

  1. Comparing writing performance in TOEFL-iBT and academic assignments: An exploration of textual features
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.02.001

January 2016

  1. Farewell to Holistic Scoring?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.12.002

July 2015

  1. Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001
  2. ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An eye-movement study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.002

April 2015

  1. Predicting EFL writing ability from levels of mental representation measured by Coh-Metrix: A structural equation modeling study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.03.001

January 2015

  1. Ideological and linguistic values in EFL examination scripts: The selection and execution of story genres
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.001

October 2014

  1. Reflexive writers: Re-thinking writing development and assessment in schools
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.002

July 2014

  1. The three-fold benefit of reflective writing: Improving program assessment, student learning, and faculty professional development
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.001
  2. Does the writing of undergraduate ESL students develop after one year of study in an English-medium university?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.01.001

January 2014

  1. How much feedback is enough?: Instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.003
  2. Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008

October 2013

  1. Show and tell: Student and instructor perceptions of screencast assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.001
  2. Everything is illuminated: What big data can tell us about teacher commentary
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.08.002

July 2013

  1. Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002

April 2013

  1. How different are they? A comparison of Generation 1.5 and international L2 learners’ writing ability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.01.003
  2. Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003
  3. Severity differences among self-assessors, peer-assessors, and teacher assessors rating EFL essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.12.002

January 2013

  1. English language learners and automated scoring of essays: Critical considerations
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.006

July 2012

  1. Test-taking strategies for a high-stakes writing test: An exploratory study of 12 Chinese EFL learners
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.03.001
  2. Using generalizability theory to examine the accuracy and validity of large-scale ESL writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.12.003

January 2012

  1. Validation of an ESL writing test in a Malaysian secondary school context
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.002
  2. A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.09.002
  3. Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.10.001

October 2011

  1. The accuracy of performance task scores after resolution of rater disagreement: A Monte Carlo study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.06.001

January 2010

  1. EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.001
  2. Can machine scoring deal with broad and open writing tests as well as human readers?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.04.002

January 2009

  1. Classroom computer experiences that stick: Two lenses on reflective timed essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.001

January 2008

  1. Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.002
  2. How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
  3. Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.001
  4. Voice in high-stakes L1 academic writing assessment: Implications for L2 writing instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003
  5. ESL students’ perceptions and experiences of standardized English writing tests
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.08.001

January 2007

  1. Rating scale impact on EFL essay marking: A mixed-method study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.001

January 2006

  1. The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.09.001
  2. The impact of bilingual dictionaries on lexical sophistication and lexical accuracy in tests of L2 writing proficiency: A quantitative analysis
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.11.001

January 2005

  1. Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.001

January 2004

  1. A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.001

January 2003

  1. L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2003.08.002

October 2002

  1. An assessment of ESL writing placement assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00028-4

January 2002

  1. Assessing L2 writing: Alternative constructs and ethical dilemmas
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00047-8

May 2000

  1. Sequel or Prequel? Son of Cooper and Odell Takes Us Back in Time
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00022-2

January 1995

  1. New directions in portfolio assessment: Reflective practice, critical theory, and large-scale scoring
    doi:10.1016/1075-2935(95)90007-1