Assessing Writing

128 articles
Year: Topic: Clear
Export:
assessment ×

January 2017

  1. Taking stock of portfolio assessment scholarship: From research to practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.003
  2. Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.005

October 2016

  1. Development and initial argument-based validation of a scoring rubric used in the assessment of L2 writing electronic portfolios
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.001
  2. “I can see that”: Developing shared rubric category interpretations through score negotiation
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.001
  3. Innovation in rubric use: Exploring different dimensions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.09.001
  4. Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.003

July 2016

  1. Student-generated scoring rubrics: Examining their formative value for improving ESL students’ writing performance
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002
  2. Awaiting a new wave: The status of state writing assessment in the United States
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.003

April 2016

  1. Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.03.001

January 2016

  1. Comparing the accuracy of different scoring methods for identifying sixth graders at risk of failing a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.003

October 2015

  1. Dance, ten; looks, three: Why rubrics matter
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.08.002
  2. Building a better rubric: Mixed methods rubric revision
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.002
  3. Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003
  4. Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.004

July 2015

  1. ESL essay raters’ cognitive processes in applying the Jacobs et al. rubric: An eye-movement study
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.05.002

April 2015

  1. A new approach towards marking large-scale complex assessments: Developing a distributed marking system that uses an automatically scaffolding and rubric-targeted interface for guided peer-review
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.11.001

January 2015

  1. An evaluation of the Writing Assessment Measure (WAM) for children's narrative writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.08.001

October 2014

  1. Just Ask Teachers: Building expertise, trusting subjectivity, and valuing difference in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.06.002
  2. Three current, interconnected concerns for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.003
  3. The challenges of emulating human behavior in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.07.002

July 2014

  1. Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003

April 2014

  1. Special issue on The use of rubrics to assess writing: Issues and challenges
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.02.002

January 2014

  1. Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008

October 2013

  1. What is the role of an international journal of writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.001
  2. How invariant and accurate are domain ratings in writing assessment?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.002

January 2013

  1. Large-scale assessment, locally-developed measures, and automated scoring of essays: Fishing for red herrings?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.11.001

October 2012

  1. “Storming and norming”: Exploring the value of group development models in addressing conflict in communal writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.05.002
  2. The Critical Thinking Analytic Rubric (CTAR): Investigating intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a scoring mechanism for critical thinking performance assessments
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.07.002
  3. A history of New York state literacy test assessment: Historicizing calls to localism in writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.05.001

July 2012

  1. Using generalizability theory to examine the accuracy and validity of large-scale ESL writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.12.003

January 2012

  1. Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.10.001

July 2011

  1. Historical view of the influences of measurement and writing theories on the practice of writing assessment in the United States
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.03.001

April 2011

  1. Assessing Writing special issue: Studies in writing assessment in New Zealand and Australia
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.02.006

January 2011

  1. Writing assessment: Shifting issues, new tools, enduring questions
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.12.001
  2. Effects of computer versus paper administration of an adult functional writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.11.001

January 2010

  1. Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.003
  2. Playing with the stakes: A consideration of an aspect of the social context of a gatekeeping writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.06.002

January 2009

  1. Looking beyond judging and ranking: Writing assessment as a generative practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.004
  2. Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002
  3. Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.001

January 2008

  1. When a “sloppy copy” is good enough: Results of a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.003
  2. Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.002
  3. Harming not helping: The impact of a Canadian standardized writing assessment on curriculum and pedagogy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.004
  4. How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
  5. Articulating a hermeneutic theory of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.005
  6. A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.04.001
  7. Voice in high-stakes L1 academic writing assessment: Implications for L2 writing instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003
  8. Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment: Student choice of composing medium, raters’ perceptions, and text quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.001
  9. Writing assessment: Expanding outwards and coming together
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.002

January 2007

  1. Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.001