Assessing Writing

279 articles
Year: Topic: Clear
Export:
assessment ×

January 2010

  1. Assessing the validity of directed self-placement at a large university
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.003
  2. Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004

January 2009

  1. Credibly assessing reading and writing abilities for both elementary student and program assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.001
  2. Looking beyond judging and ranking: Writing assessment as a generative practice
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.09.004
  3. Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing assessments: Exploring variability
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.12.002
  4. Evaluating the reliability of a detailed analytic scoring rubric for foreign language writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2009.04.001

January 2008

  1. When a “sloppy copy” is good enough: Results of a state writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.003
  2. Dangerous liaisons: Reflections on a pilot project for state-mandated outcomes assessment of written communication
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.002
  3. Harming not helping: The impact of a Canadian standardized writing assessment on curriculum and pedagogy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.004
  4. How accurate are ESL students’ holistic writing scores on large-scale assessments?—A generalizability theory approach
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.002
  5. Articulating a hermeneutic theory of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.005
  6. A statewide writing assessment model: Student proficiency and future implications
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.04.001
  7. Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.001
  8. Voice in high-stakes L1 academic writing assessment: Implications for L2 writing instruction
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.10.003
  9. Keyboarding compared with handwriting on a high-stakes writing assessment: Student choice of composing medium, raters’ perceptions, and text quality
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.03.001
  10. Writing assessment: Expanding outwards and coming together
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.05.002

January 2007

  1. ‘Little coherence, considerable strain for reader’: A comparison between two rating scales for the assessment of coherence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.07.002
  2. Genres of high-stakes writing assessments and the construct of writing competence
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.05.001
  3. Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
  4. Collaborative writing assessment: Sowing seeds for transformational adult learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.001
  5. A reply to Peter Elbow on “Community-Based Assessment Pedagogy”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2008.01.001
  6. Variations in portfolio assessment in higher education: Discussion of quality issues based on a Norwegian survey across institutions and disciplines
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.10.002
  7. Keeping assessment local: The case for accountability through formative assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.04.002

January 2006

  1. Do we need a single standard of value for institutional assessment? An essay response to Asao Inoue's “community-based assessment pedagogy”
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.003
  2. The mediation of technology in ESL writing and its implications for writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.09.001
  3. Assessing writing in cross-curricular programs: Determining the locus of activity
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2006.07.001
  4. Validating a computerized scoring system for assessing writing and placing students in composition courses
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2007.01.002
  5. Classroom assessment tools and uses: Canadian English teachers’ practices for writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.12.002

January 2005

  1. Portfolio assessment in an American Engineering College
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.02.003
  2. Self-assessment of writing in independent language learning programs: The value of annotated samples
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.06.001
  3. The effect of variations in handwriting and print on evaluation of student essays
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.05.002
  4. Key Texts in Writing Assessment
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.04.002
  5. Assessment and innovation: One darn thing leads to another
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.03.001
  6. Editorial for Assessing Writing 10, 1
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2005.04.001

January 2004

  1. (Re)articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.004
  2. Writing assessment in the world
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.02.001
  3. Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.06.001
  4. Community-based assessment pedagogy
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.12.001
  5. Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system
    doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001

January 2003

  1. Assessing writing: Are we bound by only one method?
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00018-7

October 2002

  1. The scope of writing assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00029-6
  2. An assessment of ESL writing placement assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00028-4
  3. Developing a performance-based assessment of students’ critical thinking skills
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00031-4

January 2002

  1. A book that delivers more than it promises: Sarah Cushing Weigle’s Assessing Writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(03)00004-7
  2. Language proficiency assessment for teachers: The effects of benchmarking on writing assessment in Hong Kong schools
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(02)00048-x

January 1999

  1. The development of large-scale portfolio placement assessment at the University of Michigan: 1992–1998
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00006-9
  2. Changes in secondary teachers' perceptions of barriers to portfolio assessment
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00004-5
  3. Investigating rater/prompt interactions in writing assessment: Quantitative and qualitative approaches
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00010-6
  4. Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(99)00003-3
  5. Exploring the theories and consequences of self-assessment through ethical inquiry
    doi:10.1016/s1075-2935(00)00008-8